October 2013 | October 2012 | ||||
Wk 1 | Wk 2 | Wk 3 | Wk 4 | ||
Unconditional Sales | 89 |
214
| 319 | 433 |
373
|
New Listings | 240 | 444 | 650 | 828 |
1068
|
Active Listings | 4408 | 4390 | 4369 | 4338 |
4876
|
Sales to New Listings |
37%
| 48% | 49% | 52% |
35%
|
Sales Projection | -- | 546 | 524 | 524 | |
Months of Inventory |
13.1
|
Surprisingly enough there is no slowdown in sales yet. Continued on pace of last week and should be easily over 500 sales at the end of the month.
Some chatter about an article out of Australia which shows Canadian real house prices on a flat line since 1981 and therefore there is no bubble or even the slightest hint of one. I made the assertion that the data is bullshit, and here are some more details about why.
First of all, the article references the BIS database of house prices as a source. Looking at that database, they use the New House Price Index from statscan.
Now look carefully at that data and consider that (as best as I can tell), the NHPI is NOT inflation adjusted (they say they use it as a component of the CPI). That is according to this index, NOMINAL prices for new housing in Victoria are over 20% cheaper now than in 1981.
Of course this is impossible, so there's something else at work here, which is that the data is quality adjusted. I'll let Ben explain the problem with that (scroll down for the section on NHPI).
The divergence between the NHPI and other indices like Teranet or the average national price really says it all.
I'd say that anyone using the NHPI to make some determination about the valuation of real estate in Canada is going to come to the wrong conclusion.
I'd say that anyone using the NHPI to make some determination about the valuation of real estate in Canada is going to come to the wrong conclusion.